Sunday, September 18, 2011

This summer, Western countries staged the first release of "strategic oil stocks”. This was supposed to cut petrol prices for struggling motorists.

However, enquiries by Harlow MP Robert Halfon now indicate that much of the oil was diverted away from consumers, and sold instead to major American banks.

Experts now fear that banks hoarded the oil, instead of selling it to motorists, and are likely to enjoy huge profits as a result.

Earlier this summer, as oil supplies from war-torn Libya dried up, the United States, UK, and other governments across the world released 60 million barrels of oil from their strategic reserves (1). These were intended to ease the pressure on oil prices and the wallets of families and small businesses, already suffering from price and tax increases.

But although the release knocked the pump price of petrol down a few pence, it quickly rose again. It now appears, according to an obscure "bid list" that has emerged recently from the U.S. Department of Energy (2), that banks like JPMorgan bid over 150 million dollars to secure parts of the strategic oil stocks. Instead of selling these on to motorists, they appear to have hoarded the cut-price oil on offshore tankers, waiting for prices to rise.

Harlow MP Robert Halfon said: "Whilst motorists are now paying up to £1.50 a litre for petrol, some banks appear to have been starving them of the very oil that was meant to reduce prices. If it is true, this is outrageous. We urgently need cheaper petrol, to get our economy moving again.”

A few days ago, one of the first actions of the the new head of the International Energy Agency was to halt the release of strategic oil reserves. Despite taking steps to shut down the scheme, the IEA officially claimed that the policy had been "a success" (3).

In addition, it appears that in recent years, JPMorgan has a long record of profiting from oil speculation. In 2009, the financial news group Bloomberg alleged that the U.S. bank had rented a ship for up to $40,000 dollars a day, to hoard over 200,000 tons of heating oil on a supertanker off the coast of Malta, waiting for its price to rise (4). These reports were later confirmed by shipping firms Oslo-based SeaLeague A/S, and Athens-based Optima Shipbrokers Ltd. (5).

Experts fear that this kind of speculation has prevented petrol and diesel from entering circulation in the market. In turn, this has kept prices high for those who pay through the roof to heat their homes and fill up the family car.

Mr Halfon has campaigned for months against high petrol prices. He said: "Whilst motorists and households feel the squeeze, it’s business as usual for the banks. The Government must clamp down on this. That's why I have tabled a FairFuelUKe-petition calling for cheaper petrol. So far it has got 85,000 signatures. If we get to 100,000, we can force an MPs debate in Parliament.

I urge everyone to sign the FairFuelUKe-petition here:

Notes to editors:

(1) "The United States and more than two dozen other countries that make up the International Energy Agency (IEA) put 60 million barrels of oil into the market this summer in an effort to drive down skyrocketing oil prices. Supplies were particularly tight because Libyan exports had slowed to a trickle during the uprising against strongman Moammar Gadhafi at the same time that demand was ramping up in the warmer summer months.”
(2) Figures based on the bid list released by the US Department of Energy  (
(3) Maria van der Hoeven, the new head of the IEA who began her tenure last week, said in an interview on Wednesday 07 September 2011 that the release of strategic oil reserves had been a "success”, but that the policy would be halted immediately.

Please donate to help the fight for lower fuel prices and a better deal for drivers

Share this Post:    


[ posted by tim, 18.09.11 11:57 ]

Government taxation of 70% is pure greed. There are the worst roads I have driven on in 30 years and Global warming is an institutional scam.


[ posted by Phil, 19.09.11 11:17 ]

I would point out some very obvious reasons why the story is NOT TRUE. Oil trading companies will store oil (in land storage tanks or offshore in sea tankers) for two reasons. 1. There is no demand and they simply cant sell the oil. This is what happened in 2009 and 2. The futures market is in contango which means the future price s higher than the spot value. If this is the case then you buy the oil at say $80 a barrel, sell the forward futures contract for say $90 a barrel and spend $5 a barrel on storage costs. This would make $5 a barrel profit. At the moment crude oil is backwardated. That means that the forward futures values are lower than the spot rate. In fact November crude is worth $112 a barrel, December $111, January $110, Feb $109 a berrel and so on. This means that storing oil would cost an oil trader money to the tune of $1.00 a barrel per month plus the cost of storage and the cost of financing the investment. Do you really think JP Morgan or anyone else is stupid enough to store oil that was going to lose them money?


[ posted by Fred, 16.03.12 22:22 ]

Everyone knows that "Phil" above is that same prat "Phil Moore", aka Homer whateverhisname is, the typical WUM on the FairFuel Facebook page. He is obviously an oil market spiv or something related.

Anyway it seems as if the banks have done it again with buying stragetic stock. Oil dropped to $123 then suddenly it shoots up $3 in a day after the US and UK governments both released stock to relieve the pressure. An investigation is needed by both governments into speculator activity!!


your name*

email address*

Add your own comments below this post. They are very welcome*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*