Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Howard Cox and I listened to the Chancellor hoping a new man at the helm would be cause for optimism for drivers and the economy.


This wasn’t a driver-friendly Autumn Statement. Car insurance tax went up, £1b on roads is an eightieth of what we’re about to spend on HS2, there was no significant increase in buyers incentives for low emission and electric cars no mention of plans for an electric wireless charging superhighway and only £27m on a road to join Oxford and Cambridge.  £220m on easing congestion pinch points might sound a lot but in reality it’s just a tiny raindrop echoing in a massive ocean. And while we did get fuel duty frozen until 2018, the Chancellor would have been mad not to continue the freeze we’ve so successfully campaigned for since 2011. Inflation and interest rates are at stake. 


At FairFuelUK we’re doubly disappointed with this Annual Statement since we commissioned and presented to The Treasury a CEBR report that cogently argued the case for a fuel duty reduction. The CEBR worked out that a 3p cut wouldn’t actually cost the government anything and the notional £1b cost would be wiped away by the increase in jobs and extra tax receipts from the resulting pick-up economic activity. The Chancellor chose to ignore this research and the obvious economic wisdom that cutting fuel duty is the quickest way to increase disposable income. Cut the cost of fuel and the effect on consumer spending power happens virtually overnight. This is simple economics. 


With many lower income households totally reliant on cars, the threat of rising oil prices from OPEC, congestion and pollution running at record levels, public transport buckling under pressure and many of our roads among the worst in Europe, there’s much more that the Chancellor could, and should, have done to support the UK’s road economy. And we can’t help wondering why? At PMQs, just before Phillip Hammond rose to deliver his Statement, Charlie Elphicke, MP for Dover, asked the PM if the government was going to support low income motorists with lower fuel costs. Her response inferred that the government was aware how important road transport was to the electorate and the economy, but that now has a hollow ring given that we’ve seen so little being offered to improve the lives of the UK’s 37 million drivers. 


At FairFuelUK we’re wondering if the government is still bowing to the pressure from the green lobby and that Westminster’s deeply entrenched dislike of cars, vans and trucks is still dictating fiscal policy. After the Chancellor had delivered his statement my drive from the House of Commons back to West London should have taken ten minutes but took a whole hour. Sitting impotently in fuming motionless traffic I mused that this was an Autumn Statement that won’t make life on our roads any easier. Lost opportunity, that!


Quentin WIllson

Please donate to help the fight for lower fuel prices and a better deal for drivers

Share this Post:    


[ posted by Chris Ward, 24.11.16 09:00 ]

Undoing decades of lack of investment in our roads will take years, but the simplest first step the government can take is to scrap HS2.


[ posted by James Taylor, 24.11.16 13:51 ]

"After the Chancellor had delivered his statement my drive from the House of Commons back to West London should have taken ten minutes but took a whole hour." - so take the tube! It's laziness like this that causes the congestion, that results in more restrictions on motorists who do need to use their cars/vans!


[ posted by Simon Laughton, 07.04.17 07:59 ]

In my view your questionnaire misses an important aspect. It's the older diesel that pollutes most so any scrappage scheme / road tax / Parking charges etc should be aimed at them. Electric cars are a short term fix - how many electric cars can be charged at one motorway station? Where is the government support for encouraging hydrogen?
I would be pleased to give my views on these questionnaire s before publication if that would be of help - I worked in the motor trade for most of my career so might have valid views.


[ posted by Dr. Ray Winter, 28.06.17 18:48 ]

Quentin, I see you had a good article printed in today's Evening Standard (June 28th, 2017). However I think you are missing a very important point. The government are pushing us all to have their new electricity meters so they can ensure that any electricty we draw down to top up our new E-Cars will be charged at a very substantial increase over usual household electricity. I have previously forwarded to you information on our patented solution to emissions.Be advised, we have installed hundreds of my Emission Controllers onto all types of diesel engined vehicles, including trains, in Germany and they elimimate all emissions,whilst also increasing diesel engine power by a minimum of 5% and REDUCING fuel consumption significantly. Dependent upon the state of the engine and its manufacturer, fuel reductions have varied between 8% and 22%. I can also send you the DEKRA and Germanische Lloyd analysis reports. Another point. Standby Diesel generators within London if started when the National Grid goes down will probably kill thousands through their emissions. If anybody wants to receive detailed information on my emissions controllers just send your email request to Dr. Ray


your name*

email address*

Add your own comments below this post. They are very welcome*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*